Rangers accused of 'misleading comments' as SFA hit back in John Brown row

Governing body issue response to Ibrox club claims

The Scottish Football Association has accused Rangers of issuing “misleading comments” in their criticism of punishment handed down for a remark from John Brown on the club’s media channels.

Rangers were fined £3,000 following a disciplinary hearing after being charged with breaching rule 38, which states that clubs should not allow any criticism of match officials “calculated to indicate bias or incompetence” or to “impinge upon his character”.

Former Ibrox player Brown, while working as a pundit on Rangers TV, claimed a decision not to award Rangers a goal at Easter Road on the final weekend of the league season was “corruption” amid a debate over whether the ball had crossed the line.

Rangers have been accused of making ‘misleading comments’ by the Scottish FA.placeholder image
Rangers have been accused of making ‘misleading comments’ by the Scottish FA. | Getty Images

Rangers on Thursday claimed they had “flagged numerous examples of similar incidents on club channels” during the hearing and questioned a “lack of consistency” with the SFA’s approach.

An SFA statement read: “We note Rangers’ response to the determination of a recent independent Judicial Panel Tribunal. In the interests of accuracy, we wish to address some of the misleading comments contained therein.

“The sanction imposed by an independent panel was entirely in keeping with the application of the rules. The most recent and relevant example of a similar breach, the sanction imposed on Richard Foster of Motherwell FC for comments of a similar nature in the media, attests to that.

“Furthermore, to address the comments regarding ‘rationale behind differing outcomes’, we wish to point to the fact that investigations were undertaken in previous cases outlined and that the compliance officers of the time saw fit to issue a censure by way of warning letter for potential breaches deemed insufficiently serious to be progressed to a notice of complaint.

“This system of proportionality has been adopted since the inception of the Judicial Panel Protocol in 2011. Indeed, such discretion was exercised last season when the compliance officer wrote to (Rangers) to warn of the future conduct of players following matters involving Vaclav Cerny, Dujon Sterling and Mohamed Diomande.

Former Rangers defender John Brown.placeholder image
Former Rangers defender John Brown. | SNS Group

“We also note that Rangers intend to contact the association to seek clarity on the Judicial Panel Protocol and its application. The club is, in fact, already represented on the JPP Working Group.

“We have requested written reasons from the panel chair involved in the tribunal and in the interests of transparency will publish in due course.

“JPP Rule 38 was introduced in response to the referee strike of 2010, when match officials campaigned for greater protection after enduring sustained personal criticism from clubs and fans. Ahead of a new season, we remind clubs of their responsibilities in this regard.”

Motherwell development coach Foster was handed a six-match touchline ban last September after branding the governing body’s explanation for a contentiously-awarded goal by Rangers striker Cyriel Dessers against St Johnstone “lies” while working as a pundit for BBC Scotland.

Related topics:

Comments

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.

Dare to be Honest
Follow us
© 2026 Iconic Media Group Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice