Douglas Ross: Ex-Scottish Tories leader accuses Holyrood's Presiding Officer of lying

Douglas Ross is accusing the presiding officer of not being neutral.

Douglas Ross has accused Holyrood’s Presiding Officer of lying in an ongoing dispute between the two.

Last week the former Scottish Conservative leader was ejected from the debating chamber after shouting over First Minister John Swinney, having received numerous warnings about his conduct over the previous weeks.

He then accused Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone of being biased against unionist politicians - something Ms Johnstone denies.

On Tuesday, Mr Ross then tried to raise a point of order with Ms Johnstone six times, saying he had made “several requests” to meet with her to discuss his suspension. He said: “So far, you have refused all requests”.

Presiding Officer Alison Johnstoneplaceholder image
Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone

Ms Johnstone told him to sit down three times. She added: “I have acted in a neutral manner.

“I have addressed the point of order on Thursday and I will not continue to have a dialogue in the chamber about when I am meeting you.”

Mr Ross stood up again and said: “If you are closing down all my attempts to raise this matter and you are refusing to meet me, how can you be acting in a neutral manner and treating all members equally, as you are required to do?”

Ms Johnstone then said she had not received a request to meet with him.

Posting on X, Mr Ross said: [The] parliament’s chief executive has confirmed he discussed my request for a meeting with the presiding officer last Thursday - therefore it’s not true for Alison Johnstone to say she was unaware.

“A member who makes an incorrect statement must correct the record. I believe this also applies to the presiding officer.”

Mr Ross raised the issue again on Wednesday afternoon, and Ms Johnstone said the pair would meet later in the day.

She said: “Last Thursday, I told the chief executive that I wished to meet [Scottish Conservative leader Russell] Findlay as a matter of priority, given the nature of events subsequent to my decision to ask you to leave the chamber.

“Requests were made to meet Mr Findlay on Thursday and again on Tuesday - these were declined.

“Last Thursday, the chief executive told me that he had declined your request to meet with him, and if possible me, as he was aware that I was seeking to meet Mr Findlay. I therefore considered that matter closed.”

She then said she does not think of an email as a specific request to meet.

Comments

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.

Dare to be Honest
Follow us
© 2026 Iconic Media Group Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice