Why actor Martin Compston's retreat from political debates is fresh warning sign about threat to democracy
Without a civil public discourse, democracy will wither and die
It may seem like a small thing that a Scottish actor has decided to express his opinions about politics “in a lot quieter manner now” because of the aggressive reactions by some. However, Martin Compston is far from the only person who has looked at the vitriol on social media and decided that self-censorship is the most sensible course of action.
The Line Of Duty star and Scottish independence supporter said that “people are too angry right now” and “with social media, you’re just shouting into a void... there’s not a real debate or conversation on it, it’s just people screaming at each other.” He added: “If you believe in the Union, you believe that’s right for Scotland, that’s your right. It’s as much your country as mine. I think you can waste energy arguing with people... and it can darken your day.”
In a democracy, those who disagree with Compston’s views should still recognise his right to hold them and, even more than his fellow nationalists, have a duty to stand up for his right to free speech.
READ MORE: Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife: Why silencing of gender critical voices was root cause of problem
A civil public discourse
Staunchly upholding the rights of those who agree with you is all very well, but a true commitment to free speech requires that you actively support the same rights for your political opponents. As the saying goes, “I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”.
Without a civil public discourse, democracy will wither and die. If we stop talking to one another, then the conversations necessary to prevent complicated, difficult and emotive issues from escalating into a ‘culture war’ – or, worse, actual violence – do not happen.
In our fractious times, it has never been more important to embrace and promote the idea of “disagreeing agreeably”. In that endeavour, politicians can play a role but only to an extent.
Ultimately, this is a social problem that requires a social solution. We all need to act in accordance with democratic values, basic human rights like free speech and simple decency, while also condemning unacceptable abuse – politely, but in the strongest terms.
Comments
Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.