Exclusive:Scots universities in stark warning to Home Office over 'serious weaknesses' in student visa scheme
Universities Scotland has warned institutions are being driven towards a ‘cliff edge’ by changes to student visa rules
Scottish universities are being “driven towards a cliff edge” by new student visa changes, the sector has claimed.
From June, the UK government has introduced the most stringent visa sponsorship compliance regime of any UK sector.
It is feared the new rules will disproportionately affect Scottish institutions given the reliance on international student fees.
Professor James Miller is Principal and Vice Chancellor of University of the West of Scotland and Convener of Universities Scotland.
READ MORE:A barely audible 'guilty' marks the pinnacle of the Peter Murrell drama that has dogged the SNP
He said the UK government must engage more fully with the sector as the changes are “driving us towards a cliff edge”.
Funding for Scottish-domiciled students has been declining over a number of years and is less than that provided for students in England.
“Because the level of cross-subsidy from international students to domestic students is much higher in Scotland, then it will have a disproportionate impact in Scotland,” Prof Miller said.
“Scotland's demographic is different from England - we need more immigration in Scotland and that’s how our economy will grow.”
Student visa applications require a Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies (CAS) that are allocated to sponsor universities by UKVI.
Reforms to the system have introduced new thresholds and a “red, amber, green” ratings system.
The red, amber and green measures are used to quantify whether universities are compliant in their handing of visas.
However, universities will not be allowed to see the data in real time, meaning they will struggle to take remedial action.
One standard is the proportion of visas that are refused by the Home Office.
This metric will change from Monday with the refusal threshold dropping from 10 per cent to five per cent.
After visas have been issued, there are further requirements of universities.
One is that 90 per cent of those students should then enrol; this is rising to 95 per cent.
The final metric is course completion, which will rise from 85 per cent to 90 per cent.
Professor Dame Sally Mapstone, Principal and Vice Chancellor of the University of St Andrews, said: “The problem with the red, amber, green system is that there is potentially a fundamental unfairness in it, particularly in two respects.
“One is that an institution can be labeled as amber, even if they are compliant with the metrics as redefined.
“Amber would then mean they are effectively on a warning but red would bring penalties that are potentially very severe.”
These consequences could include a university losing its capacity to admit international students.
Current analysis of existing data suggests 10 to 15 per cent of institutions - 22 universities - are likely to struggle and face potential risks of suspension.
It is also calculated that 40 to 50 per cent of the wider sector might be affected.
Prof Mapstone added: “This is likely to have a deterrent effect on international students applying from countries which feel they're likely to be particularly vulnerable to refusal rates.
“That is likely to see potentially a diminishing in international students applying to our universities because they think they're less likely to be successful.”
Falling within 20 per cent of a threshold results in an Amber rating, even if the institution is technically compliant.
Ratings will be published in the Student Sponsor Record, creating reputational risk.
Meanwhile, penalties for Red ratings are significant for institutions, including a 12‑month Home Office action plan; a five‑year “black mark,” where a second Red may trigger licence revocation; and a reduction in CAS income.
Amber ratings may also have repercussions on credit ratings and bank lending conditions.
Prof Mapstone added: “Obviously university vice chancellors absolutely support the need for a robust and fair immigration system.
“It isn't in anybody's interest for students to be coming to universities when they're not prepared to work hard and get the degree that they should be applying to university for, so that that is not at issue.
“What is at issue is the law of unintended consequences and the the potential lack of fairness in bringing in this red, amber and green system when universities do not have visibility of the data that lies behind it.”
The academic said there is already “anxiety” that evidence shows the UKVI and the Home Office are slowing down visa processing and “behaving much more potentially obstructively towards admission of students from from certain countries”.
Figures from last year’s admissions for the January 2026 intake estimated some 2300 students did not receive visa decisions in time.
This equates to around £48 million in lost income, even before these new changes come in to force.
“The irony here, of course,” Prof Mapstone added, “Is that the government has recently introduced its new, very ambitious international education strategy, which is premised on the notion that the UK is welcoming.
“Yet the other side of this is that the Home Office is bearing down very hard in a way which actually is going to make it extremely difficult for institutions to be compliant.”
Universities in the amber zone will still be complaint but there is a concern about reputational damage when the rating is made public.
Prof Mapstone added: “That it indicates you're potentially in some form of peril does not seem fair in our view.
“It should be used for genuine risk rather than indicating proximity to an existing threshold.
“So we feel these are really serious weaknesses with the system that's being brought in very quickly in June and that therefore government ought to be focusing on gradual transitional arrangements, bringing in safeguards, running pilots, testing things out, so that these actually potentially quite serious consequences don't transpire.
“I would hate that in two years' time we were looking at a situation where a number of Scottish universities, through no fault of their own, were really suffering to look after all of their students because of a significant fall in international student income that could have been - and should have been - avoided.”
Prof Miller said a change in approach in terms of visa delays and refusals means students who wish to study in the UK are at a disadvantage.
He said many international students are from families that make sacrifices to allow them to study abroad before returning home to make a difference in their own countries.
Those who stay, he added, contribute to the local economy and “contribute to cross-cultural impact” for Scottish students.
Reputational risk is of a “magnitude much bigger”, he says.
“Universities are not against any kind of a robust and fair migration compliance scheme,” he added.
“It is not in our interests to have students come to us with no intention to study - we absolutely want to make sure we are providing opportunities for bona fide students.”
Universities Scotland is calling for the UK government to introduce visa changes in a phased way with transparency in data sharing.
Prof Miller added: “What is sometimes lost, because we are talking about large numbers, is that we are talking about human stories and the impact that has on individuals.
“Behind every statistic, there is a hopeful young person seeking to advance their career, advance their life opportunities, but who is being denied.”
Scottish government Minister for Innovation, Technology and Tertiary Education Ben Macpherson said: “The UK Government's Immigration White Paper is seriously undermining Scotland's higher and further education sectors'ability to attract and retain talented international students and graduates, who enrich our communities and help drive up economic growth.
“We continue to call on the UK Government to create an immigration system that meets Scotland's distinct economic and demographic needs, and urge the Home Office to engage seriously with concerns raised by Universities Scotland. All powers over immigration are currently in the hands of the UK Government. There are multiple ways in which tailored Scottish solutions could be implemented, like the previous Fresh Talent scheme.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “We strongly value the contribution of international students and recognise their importance to the UK’s world-leading universities.
“That’s why we’re tightening the rules to prevent abuse of our immigration system and ensure education providers take their responsibilities seriously.”
Comments
Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.